My video got yeeted for “medical misinformation.” This raises some legal questions. What qualifies a video hosting site to offer medical advice? Is a company like Google which is subsidized by taxpayer money allowed to disregard freedom of speech?
Tag: Freedom of Speech
The Supreme Court is Wrong on Youtube

Just read about that supreme court decision where they threw out PraegerU’s claim that YouTube is subject to the 1st amendment.
This was the position of the judges: “merely hosting speech by others is not a traditional, exclusive public function and does not alone transform private entities into state actors subject to First Amendment constraints.”
Here’s a list of subsidies from around 2010 that Google the owner of YouTube received:
https://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/googles-billions-in-internet-subsidies/
Who knows how much more was thrown their way these past 11 years.
That’s taxpayer money.
I’m a taxpayer.
Don’t restrict my speech.
And don’t play doctor.
